Mochila Brings Choice, Control, Order to Contextual Advertising

mochila_logo.gif

The biggest problem with contextual advertising is that it relies on a computer to decide which content the ad should appear beside. That alone has provided for gaff after gaff after gaff. While not always the case, contextual advertising is usually site-specific and the site, versus the content, is what is purchased. The ad, then, appears in a contextually relevant position within that site. A new company, Mochila, is changing this model dramatically. The company just announced a content exchange where publishers sell the content they create and buy the content others have created. Unlike wire services that provide content with an annual subscription, Mochila will offer content for individual purchase.

Expanding on this offering, Mochila will announce at ad:tech next week in San Francisco an online ad service that will connect advertising directly to content. Since it has built a content exchange, the company will layer on and attach advertising to that content. Rather than make a contextual ad buy across a site or across a network, advertisers, through Mochila, will by ad space within content relevant to the advertised product and the ad will “follow” the content wherever it travels throughout and beyond the Mochila content exchange.

While proof will come over time, it would seem everyone wins with this scenario. Publisher make money by selling content. Those who need content and supply it to their readers can either buy it or get it for free along with attached ads. And advertiser gain more control over contextual ad placements since they are able to more finitely choose where their ads appear.

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

7 things people quietly outgrow once they become comfortable with who they are

7 things people quietly outgrow once they become comfortable with who they are

Hack Spirit

Cornell researcher Vanessa Bohns has spent years studying why people agree to requests they’d rather decline, and her research consistently finds that people dramatically overestimate the social cost of saying no, which means most of the exhaustion of over-committing gets paid for a consequence that was never really on the table

Cornell researcher Vanessa Bohns has spent years studying why people agree to requests they’d rather decline, and her research consistently finds that people dramatically overestimate the social cost of saying no, which means most of the exhaustion of over-committing gets paid for a consequence that was never really on the table

Global English Editing

If you want a quieter mind as you get older, say goodbye to these 8 daily habits

If you want a quieter mind as you get older, say goodbye to these 8 daily habits

Hack Spirit

If someone does these 7 things when you succeed, they are probably not really your friend

If someone does these 7 things when you succeed, they are probably not really your friend

Hack Spirit

If you want people to warm to you, consider dropping these 7 habits

If you want people to warm to you, consider dropping these 7 habits

Hack Spirit

If someone is keeping score without telling you, they’ll usually display these 9 subtle behaviors

If someone is keeping score without telling you, they’ll usually display these 9 subtle behaviors

Hack Spirit