Victoria’s Secret Collegiate Collection: Hijacked for the Lulz

  • 2 min read
vs-pink-collegiate.jpg

Victoria’s Secret Pink Collegiate represents everything wrong (but sellable!) about college: bright-eyed, gum-popping sorority girls that coordinate dog leashes to their shoes, non-merit-based exclusivity (unless heart-shaped hickeys count), high-pitched voices, strawberry blondes, fruity body spray, polka dots, and pink.

Victoria’s Secret recently gave unrepresented schools the chance to join the Pink Collegiate Collection — a pupil-dilating clothing line sporting Pinkified uni logos and mascots. Probably for the above-mentioned reasons, a passel of hackers decided to have their way with the system.

Drexel University broke into the Collegiate Collection first, registering five million votes on the online poll — marking a successful marketing strategy, in VS’s opinion, until it found out most of the votes were automated.

“Another computer science major and I had found the Facebook group promoting the contest and […] we thought it would be funny,” said Tim Plunkett of Drexel. He and a buddy created a Perl script that logged over five million votes for Drexel in a paltry 12 hours.

Plunkett attributed his success to the lax security protecting the VS contest site, and over time other programmers from different schools — including MIT and Virginia Polytechnic Institute — started competing to see who could infiltrate it most quickly.

Nearly all the schools in the Top 25 were the result of rigged program-generated voting. You can probably tell the auto-bot schools by their unsexy pallor: George Mason, Texas Tech, Zion Bible College, Wellesley. (The last two were nominated courtesy of MIT, which earned a ban for all its zeal.) The contest page now has a disclaimer that shrilly exclaims, “NO cheating! Automated votes will NOT be counted!”

Source site UWire wraps this story up with an on-high lesson from programmers about how companies should be more cognizant of their security needs. I don’t think that’s sufficient; people are gonna mess with you if they wanna mess with you. So probably the safest takeaway is: “Beware the lulz.”

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES
Uncategorized

Lazy people who become highly disciplined often practice these 10 simple habits
Uncategorized

People who light up every room they walk into usually display these 8 subtle behaviors
Uncategorized

10 little things to start doing now to get ahead of everyone else in 5 years
Uncategorized

People who are naturally quiet but highly observant usually display these 8 subtle behaviors
Uncategorized

If a man feels proud to have you in his life, he’ll usually display these 9 behaviors
Strange

Dad Uses Hot Daughter to Sell Car on eBay

Load more

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Psychology says the reason some people seem to intuitively understand human nature isn’t magic — it’s that they’ve spent decades paying attention to the gap between what people say and what they actually do

Psychology says the reason some people seem to intuitively understand human nature isn’t magic — it’s that they’ve spent decades paying attention to the gap between what people say and what they actually do

Global English Editing
I’m 73 and widowed and the hardest part isn’t the silence at night. It’s Sunday mornings, when the whole world seems organized around pairs and families and I’m standing in a coffee shop trying to look like someone who chose to be alone rather than someone whose person simply isn’t coming back.

I’m 73 and widowed and the hardest part isn’t the silence at night. It’s Sunday mornings, when the whole world seems organized around pairs and families and I’m standing in a coffee shop trying to look like someone who chose to be alone rather than someone whose person simply isn’t coming back.

Global English Editing
Psychology says parents who unconsciously compete with their adult child’s partner for closeness don’t realize they’re running a test the child can’t pass — because choosing the partner looks like betrayal and choosing the parent feels like regression, and the child eventually solves it by choosing distance, which is the one outcome nobody wanted but everyone’s behavior made inevitable

Psychology says parents who unconsciously compete with their adult child’s partner for closeness don’t realize they’re running a test the child can’t pass — because choosing the partner looks like betrayal and choosing the parent feels like regression, and the child eventually solves it by choosing distance, which is the one outcome nobody wanted but everyone’s behavior made inevitable

Global English Editing
Research suggests people who put items back exactly where they found them in stores — even when they decide not to buy them — aren’t just being considerate, they’re revealing a worldview where other people’s labor is visible and valuable, not invisible

Research suggests people who put items back exactly where they found them in stores — even when they decide not to buy them — aren’t just being considerate, they’re revealing a worldview where other people’s labor is visible and valuable, not invisible

Global English Editing
Psychology says the most painful form of parent-child distance isn’t estrangement, it’s functional politeness — where calls happen on schedule, visits are brief and pleasant, and nobody says anything real, because both people have silently agreed that surface-level contact is safer than the honest conversation that might break something neither of them knows how to repair

Psychology says the most painful form of parent-child distance isn’t estrangement, it’s functional politeness — where calls happen on schedule, visits are brief and pleasant, and nobody says anything real, because both people have silently agreed that surface-level contact is safer than the honest conversation that might break something neither of them knows how to repair

Global English Editing
Research suggests people who instinctively protect bugs instead of killing them have a fundamentally different relationship with power — they’ve internalized that strength means choosing restraint, not domination

Research suggests people who instinctively protect bugs instead of killing them have a fundamentally different relationship with power — they’ve internalized that strength means choosing restraint, not domination

Global English Editing
Load more