That Washing Metro Ad Might Be Sexist But It Had No Choice

washingtom_metro_talk_shoes.jpg

So the Washington Transit Authority ran an ad in which one woman says, “A Metrobus travels about 8,260 miles between breakdowns. Didn’t know that, did you?” and another responds, “Can’t we just talk about shoes?” It’s being called sexist and has everyone’s boxers in a bunch.

The ad might be sexist but that’s not really the problem. It’s just incredible lame creative. Like really, really bad. And if this scenario were to happen in real life and someone turned to you and told you how many miles a bus drove without a breakdown, you’d likely look at them and say “Who the fuck cares?” and then follow that up with something inane like, oh, asking if we can talk about shoes instead. So from that perspective, that ad is just mimicking life.

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

9 habits of people who stay genuinely curious about the world well into their 80s

9 habits of people who stay genuinely curious about the world well into their 80s

Hack Spirit

If you’d rather have one deep conversation than ten small ones, you probably share these 8 traits

If you’d rather have one deep conversation than ten small ones, you probably share these 8 traits

Hack Spirit

9 phrases people with real humility use when they’re proven wrong

9 phrases people with real humility use when they’re proven wrong

Hack Spirit

If you can sit through a whole meal without checking your phone, you have a discipline most people have lost

If you can sit through a whole meal without checking your phone, you have a discipline most people have lost

Hack Spirit

7 gentle ways to set a boundary without ever sounding cold

7 gentle ways to set a boundary without ever sounding cold

Hack Spirit

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Global English Editing