NASCAR Has Something to Prove, Uses Tees to Get Mean

nascar_talkin2tee.jpg

Debates over the legitimacy of racecar-driving as a “real” sport aside, there’s one sport we never get tired of playing: mouthing off, a pastime NASCAR leverages in the ads for its Busch Series races.

To add texture to this most stimulating of face-offs, the ad-splattered organization features talking heads on ad tees. Iron-on drivers trash each other, make fun of their over-the-hill future selves and call out sluggish competitors.

Credited to BooneOakley, the campaign will run on ABC, ESPN and ESPN2, FOX and SPEED, as well as during the Nextel Cup races. Prints and Internet banners will also be floating around in NASCAR-oriented publications and sites.

The ads are compelling enough to inspire us to buy a NASCAR shirt, though we’d be bummed if we stood around waiting for them to talk and they just … didn’t.

For the buzzkills who respond to trash-talk with “WTF, mate? Got something to prove?!”, NASCAR prepares the perfect slogan: Hell yeah, fucktard! “We’ve got something to prove.” We added the first part, but we know that’s what they meant.

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Why some friendships pick up right where they left off, even after years apart

Why some friendships pick up right where they left off, even after years apart

Hack Spirit

9 small things people who age gracefully refuse to apologise for

9 small things people who age gracefully refuse to apologise for

Hack Spirit

8 little signs someone has stopped competing with everyone around them

8 little signs someone has stopped competing with everyone around them

Hack Spirit

People who age with grace usually stop worrying about these 8 things

People who age with grace usually stop worrying about these 8 things

Hack Spirit

9 things people who’ve weathered real hardship almost never complain about

9 things people who’ve weathered real hardship almost never complain about

Hack Spirit

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Global English Editing