Is Samsung’s ‘Evolutionary Husband’ Ad Sexist?

samsung_evolutionary_husband.png

In an effort to tout Samsung’s new Evolution Kit, some kind of device that makes your tired, old TV awesome and new, the brand has dipped its toe into the anti-objectification of women waters with Evolutionary Husband.

In the ad, a wife, tired of her slovenly husband’s burping, farting, Neanderthal ways, plugs the Samsung Evolution Kit into his back and, poof, he instantly becomes…a stereotypically 1950’s housewife who effortlessly cooks, cleans, babysits and generally serves his wife’s every need…much like the stereotypical 1950’s housewife did for her husband.

It’s no surprise ads over the last 20 years or so have turned the tables on men painting them as idiotic imbeciles who can’t figure out how to use the internet (Verizon!), sackless wimps who don’t have the balls to drink beer whenever they feel like it (Bud Light!) or socially inept buffoons with an IQ of 2 (Holiday Inn!)

Is this trend sexist against men? Is it just payback for all those years marketers portrayed women as bimbo-esque decor to be placed in front of a refrigerator or draped over the hood of a car?

We think it’s a little bit of both with a dollop of schadenfruede tossed in. It’s a well known fact many people find joy in the mockery of others and this fact is exponentially true with men. Men love to taunt and one-up each other.

Acknowledging this joy, this ad will likely be very effective with men in the sense that they can feel superior to this epic couch potato because they are already awesome in the kitchen, awesome in the bedroom and awesome at work. This kind of ad just makes men feel all that much better about themselves knowing there are plenty of other men out there who, in comparison to themselves, are submissive, idiotic imbeciles with no cajones.

And for women, the ad delivers chuckles and inspiration as well. Because as we all know, many men ARE occasional couch potatoes who shirk their household responsibilities in favor of a beer, some beef jerky and a good sporting event. All of which allows a woman to A) feel better that her husband isn’t, in comparison, a complete slouch, B) feel better that she’s not alone and that there are other women out there dealing with slobbish types and C) feel empowered to get her lazy ass husband off the couch because, well, the guy in the Samsung ad did.

So is the ad sexist or just endemic of today’s interpersonal relationship between men and women? We’re going with not sexist on this one. What about you?

YouTube video

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Psychology says the difference between being kind and compulsive people-pleasing is whether you can stop doing it without feeling like you’ve committed a crime — which is why some people physically cannot leave a messy restaurant table

Psychology says the difference between being kind and compulsive people-pleasing is whether you can stop doing it without feeling like you’ve committed a crime — which is why some people physically cannot leave a messy restaurant table

Global English Editing

I’m 68 and the unhappiness didn’t arrive suddenly. It came the day I realized I’d spent forty years building a life that required me to be needed, and now nobody needs me for anything that actually matters

I’m 68 and the unhappiness didn’t arrive suddenly. It came the day I realized I’d spent forty years building a life that required me to be needed, and now nobody needs me for anything that actually matters

Global English Editing

Psychology says the boomer women who are most difficult to be close to in later life aren’t the ones who suffered most—they’re the ones who spent decades converting their suffering into a permanent orientation towards the world, one that keeps score, expects compensation, and experiences other people’s happiness as a quiet affront to everything they’ve had to endure

Psychology says the boomer women who are most difficult to be close to in later life aren’t the ones who suffered most—they’re the ones who spent decades converting their suffering into a permanent orientation towards the world, one that keeps score, expects compensation, and experiences other people’s happiness as a quiet affront to everything they’ve had to endure

Global English Editing

Psychology says the loneliest people in their 60s and 70s aren’t the ones who never married or had kids — they’re the ones whose entire identity was built around being needed and nobody needs them anymore

Psychology says the loneliest people in their 60s and 70s aren’t the ones who never married or had kids — they’re the ones whose entire identity was built around being needed and nobody needs them anymore

Global English Editing

Psychology says the reason emotionally intelligent people still ghost is because they’ve run hundreds of potential conversation scenarios in their minds and every single one ends with them being misunderstood, dismissed, or turned into the villain

Psychology says the reason emotionally intelligent people still ghost is because they’ve run hundreds of potential conversation scenarios in their minds and every single one ends with them being misunderstood, dismissed, or turned into the villain

Global English Editing

Psychology says the boomer generation had almost no cultural language for social anxiety or introversion—you were shy or you weren’t, you needed to push through it, you’d grow out of it—and the people who didn’t grow out of it simply learned to manage it well enough that nobody saw it, and arrived at later life with a perfectly functional social exterior and an interior that still finds every gathering costs considerably more than it appears to

Psychology says the boomer generation had almost no cultural language for social anxiety or introversion—you were shy or you weren’t, you needed to push through it, you’d grow out of it—and the people who didn’t grow out of it simply learned to manage it well enough that nobody saw it, and arrived at later life with a perfectly functional social exterior and an interior that still finds every gathering costs considerably more than it appears to

Global English Editing