Hugh Hefner Sets Things Straight on Changes to Playboy

NPR: On the Media

BROOKE GLADSTONE: You were quoted in a story in the New York Observer last month saying that Playboy was looking to pull back from the explicit nature of its sexuality. How come?

HUGH HEFNER: Well I think that explicit sexuality has less meaning today. You know the speculation after that interview was that I was going to be taking the nudity out of the magazine. Now that is obviously not my intention. But I think that we can do other kinds of things and emphasize other kinds of things in the magazine. What I’m looking for is an appropriate mix that is more satisfying.

BROOKE GLADSTONE: Does that mean no more centerfold?

HUGH HEFNER: No, it certainly doesn’t mean no centerfolds.

Good to know.

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

9 habits of people who stay genuinely curious about the world well into their 80s

9 habits of people who stay genuinely curious about the world well into their 80s

Hack Spirit

If you’d rather have one deep conversation than ten small ones, you probably share these 8 traits

If you’d rather have one deep conversation than ten small ones, you probably share these 8 traits

Hack Spirit

9 phrases people with real humility use when they’re proven wrong

9 phrases people with real humility use when they’re proven wrong

Hack Spirit

If you can sit through a whole meal without checking your phone, you have a discipline most people have lost

If you can sit through a whole meal without checking your phone, you have a discipline most people have lost

Hack Spirit

7 gentle ways to set a boundary without ever sounding cold

7 gentle ways to set a boundary without ever sounding cold

Hack Spirit

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Global English Editing