Dating Site’s Hook Ups Based on Love of Similar Brands

brand_mates.png

Anything launched on April Fool’s Day is, by default, suspect which is why Brand-mates, a site on which people can share the brand they love with others, just doesn’t seem quite right. A site where brand lovers can create relationships with the brands others love? Sounds like an MBA’d account planner got together with some Web 2.0 type to create this thing. Oh wait, that’s exactly what happened!

Marketing/idea company Mental Images put this thing, Brand-Mates, together. But that’s the end of our jest. The guy behind Mental Images is the guy behind MyPetFat and Dormant Forces magazine. Around here at Adrants, we’ve known him for years. He’s a passionate guy and he believes people can be passionate about brands.

The genesis for Brand-Mates came out of a conversation Jay had with his sister a year ago who lamented, “All I want is to meet a man who likes getting up early in the morning for a Starbucks and joining me at Barnes & Noble.” While most people don’t talk like that, some, indeed, do and brands are every intertwined with their every day life.

Jay think Brand Mates is a new kind of dating site. A site where “likes attract” is celebrated and, materialistic as it may sound, the love for similar brands is the engine the site uses to match people with compatible others.

It may sound like an odd way to hook people up but a company called Airtroductions hooks people up based on who they will be sitting next to on their next airplane flight. Apparently, nobody meets at church dinners or school committee meeting anymore so someon’s gotta step in and help. Stranger things have hooked people up. Why not brands?

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

8 things people who give thoughtful gifts pay attention to all year

8 things people who give thoughtful gifts pay attention to all year

Hack Spirit

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Global English Editing

8 signs your in-laws see you as their own, not just someone their child married

8 signs your in-laws see you as their own, not just someone their child married

Hack Spirit

Many adult children remember watching a father work sixty-hour weeks for decades so the family could have what he never did, then watched him die in his sixties without ever prioritizing his own happiness, and now see that same pattern quietly repeating in their own lives, under a different name.

Many adult children remember watching a father work sixty-hour weeks for decades so the family could have what he never did, then watched him die in his sixties without ever prioritizing his own happiness, and now see that same pattern quietly repeating in their own lives, under a different name.

Global English Editing

Harvard researchers had 166 undergraduates rate their own pets on qualities like thoughtful, considerate and sympathetic, and the students who felt most chronically disconnected from other people scored their pets meaningfully higher on exactly those three traits, and no others.

Harvard researchers had 166 undergraduates rate their own pets on qualities like thoughtful, considerate and sympathetic, and the students who felt most chronically disconnected from other people scored their pets meaningfully higher on exactly those three traits, and no others.

Global English Editing

University of Arizona researchers wired 79 people with a recorder sampling conversations every 12.5 minutes for four days and found the happiest had twice as many substantive conversations and a third as much small talk as the unhappiest, suggesting the discomfort was never a social deficit.

University of Arizona researchers wired 79 people with a recorder sampling conversations every 12.5 minutes for four days and found the happiest had twice as many substantive conversations and a third as much small talk as the unhappiest, suggesting the discomfort was never a social deficit.

Global English Editing