Bob Garfield’s Reign Questioned (And Not Just by Us)

wendys_hole2.jpg

The Daily Ad Biz is going after Advertising Age’s Bob Garfield. In a piece entitled “Fire Bob Garfield, First in a Series,” the writer examines a recent article by Bob entitled “Just Imagine How Trump Would Have Looked in Wendy’s Red Wig.” In the The Daily Ad Biz article, Bob is taken to task, sentence by sentence, for his seemingly “out of touch crotchety old man” approach to criticizing advertising.

While some, though not us, trashed the Wendy’s Red Wig campaign to one degree or another, when Bob says an ad is bad, he claims (barring a few “horrifying exceptions”) he’s always right and that the facts are there to back him up. So it was with great interest The Daily Ad Biz shared with us the recently released 2007 full year and Q4 financial figures for Wendy’s which, counter to the belief same store sales have been flat, reports same store sales saw a 1.4 percent increase as compared to 2006’s 0.6 percent increase.

Additionally, 2007 income increased 134 percent to $96 million, up from $37 million in 2006. That Red Wig campaign isn’t looking so bad right now. To be clear, though Bob Garfield might disagree, it’s nearly impossible to clearly tie corporate performance to a specific advertising effort. Certainly, associations can be drawn but there are simply too many other variables both promotional and operational to scientifically prove financial performance is directly related to a particular advertising effort.

That said, the existence of the Red Wing campaign at the same time the chain saw an upswing in income causes Bob’s claim that “if you were to compare my ad review ratings with advertiser business results over the past 20-some years, or even campaign-longevity, you’d probably give up blogging and start a cult of personality based on my personal infallibility” to ring just a tad hollow.

To be clear, Bob Garfield is an institution. He’s been an icon in the advertising industry for more than two decades. He’s analyzed thousands of ads over those years. We respect his position as we would anyone who’s achieved similar success. But like any institution that’s been around for a while, complacent acceptance is never a good thing. As they say, question authority.

Picture of Steve Hall

Steve Hall

RECENT ARTICLES

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

7 things people who hit snooze five times a morning have in common

7 things people who hit snooze five times a morning have in common

Hack Spirit

7 things people who work with their hands understand that office workers rarely do

7 things people who work with their hands understand that office workers rarely do

Hack Spirit

7 things decisive people do differently than people who are just impulsive

7 things decisive people do differently than people who are just impulsive

Hack Spirit

8 things people who give thoughtful gifts pay attention to all year

8 things people who give thoughtful gifts pay attention to all year

Hack Spirit

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Global English Editing

8 signs your in-laws see you as their own, not just someone their child married

8 signs your in-laws see you as their own, not just someone their child married

Hack Spirit